Project economics

Understand the value stack.
Test the assumptions.

Treatment economics, useful products and project costs belong in one view. This illustrative tool explores arithmetic, not NZP plant performance.

Illustrative scenario / £ GBP

What changes the commercial case?

Edit the assumptions below. Product output is a user-entered scenario, not a feedstock-to-output prediction. Use net energy exported after internal plant consumption.

Treatment revenue means contracted net gate-fee income, not avoided customer disposal costs. Enter a non-negative value. Where the project pays for feedstock, include that cost within operating costs.

Illustrative annual contribution
£1,400,000

Before financing, tax, depreciation and major replacement reserves.

Net treatment revenue£1,600,000
Electricity sales£800,000
Operating costs− £1,000,000
Simple payback10.7 years
Simple payback is capital ÷ positive annual contribution. This is not IRR, a forecast or a validated investment case.Screen a real project
Before investment

The assumptions that need evidence.

Feedstock & operations

Supply contracts, preparation, moisture and composition, plant availability, internal energy consumption and residue treatment.

Products & offtake

Net saleable volumes, specification, conditioning, customer demand, contract price, transport and delivery responsibilities.

Capital & carbon

Equipment, installation, utilities, contingencies, finance and whole-system carbon performance. Carbon credits require separate eligibility.

Let’s make a start

Your residual material could be a new starting point.

Tell us what you have, where you are and what you need. We’ll establish the right first step.

Start a project discussion